Asbestos Scare Leaves Hospitality Business Uninsured

1

The business was poised to provide bar services for the event scheduled for February 18 last year but was halted when authorities closed the park due to the health risk. The business argued that its BI policy should cover the losses through an additional benefit clause extending damage cover to customers and suppliers or via a prevention of access provision.

However, Suncorp, the insurer, declined the claim. The insurer highlighted that the policy contained an exclusion for contamination, which the claimant sought to contest by arguing that the contamination was the result of malicious actions. Despite this, Suncorp stated the claimant did not establish that the alleged damage happened during the policy period or “at the premises” of a customer or supplier.

The insurer further clarified that access to the claimant's premises was not directly prevented or hindered, and the park's closure was a precautionary measure due to community health concerns. Consequently, the prevention of access clause was not applicable in this scenario.

The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) reviewed the dispute and recognised that asbestos in the mulch may constitute damage. Nonetheless, they pointed out that the contamination could have occurred prior to the insurance period. The claimant failed to produce detailed evidence regarding the connections between their business, the park, and the event organisers. AFCA could not ascertain if the contamination affected premises related to the claimant's business dealings.

AFCA found no malicious intent behind the contamination, noting the NSW Environment Protection Authority conducted investigations, yet did not attribute the incident to deliberate actions. Without concrete evidence of malice, the policy’s contamination exclusion applied.

Ultimately, AFCA decided the prevention of access cover was not triggered since the claimant’s access to their own premises was unaffected directly by the park’s closure. Although the park's shutdown did occur within a stipulated 50km radius of the insured premises, the insurer relied on policy terms to deny the claim. This decision underscores the complexities businesses face in navigating coverage for unforeseen interruptions.

Published:Friday, 4th Jul 2025
Source: Paige Estritori

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Clear

Asbestos Scare Leaves Hospitality Business Uninsured 04 Jul 2025: Paige Estritori The discovery of asbestos-contaminated mulch in a Sydney park led to the cancellation of a festival, resulting in significant financial losses for a hospitality business. Despite these setbacks, the company's claim for coverage under its business interruption (BI) policy was rejected. - read more

Landmark NSW Decision: Dog Walking Costs Covered in Car Crash Injury Claims 03 Jul 2025: Paige Estritori In a groundbreaking decision by the NSW Personal Injury Commission, an insurer has been directed to cover the costs of dog walking services for a car crash victim. The commission ruled that these services classify as domestic assistance under the state’s Motor Accident Injuries Act. This case could pave the way for broader interpretations of 'attendant care services' for claimants. - read more

Extreme Weather Drives $1.8 Billion in First Half Losses for Australian Insurers 03 Jul 2025: Paige Estritori Extreme weather events in Australia have resulted in significant financial impacts for insurers, tallying $1.83 billion in losses during the first half of the year. This comes as insurance companies gear up for further claims linked to ongoing severe weather in New South Wales. - read more